Phone No.
(780) 450-3957
A metals laboratory result tells you the concentration of a selected element measured in the submitted soil sample using the applicable analytical method.
But detecting a metal does not automatically mean the soil is contaminated.
Many elements occur naturally in soil. Interpretation may therefore require consideration of:
A useful interpretation framework is:
PBR Laboratories supports metals testing in soil for environmental, industrial, remediation and land-use projects throughout Alberta, Western Canada and Canada.
A laboratory metals result reports the concentration measured for a specific element in the submitted sample.
The result needs context.
For example, the same numerical concentration can have different significance depending on:
The laboratory result provides the analytical measurement.
The broader environmental investigation determines what that measurement means for the site.
The exact analytical scope should be confirmed with PBR based on the project requirements and current laboratory method availability.
Metals testing may be relevant to environmental investigations involving:
The correct element list should be selected according to the site history and project objective.
No.
This is one of the most important distinctions on this resource.
Many metals and other elements occur naturally in soil.
A detected concentration therefore does not, by itself, establish that:
Instead, ask:
Detection is the beginning of interpretation—not the conclusion.
An elevated result means the measured concentration is above the comparison value being used for the project.
That may warrant further investigation.
It does not automatically determine:
The next step depends on the environmental question.
A practical decision sequence is:
Elevated result
↓
Confirm analyte, units and applicable criteria
↓
Confirm sample location and depth
↓
Review site history
↓
Consider natural/background conditions
↓
Compare surrounding samples
↓
Determine whether additional sampling is needed
↓
Consider groundwater or other environmental media where relevant
This prevents one analytical number from being treated as a complete site conclusion.
Related Resource: What to Do After an Elevated Soil Test Result →
Some elements occur naturally because of:
For this reason, a detected metal should not automatically be attributed to industrial contamination.
The broader investigation may need to distinguish between:
naturally occurring concentration
and
potential site-related contribution
This may require comparison with background information, surrounding samples and site history.
Site history can help determine whether a metals result has a plausible anthropogenic source.
Relevant historical activities may include:
A former fuel-storage property and a former metal-processing facility should not automatically receive the same metals investigation.
Metals concentrations can vary across a property.
Consider samples collected:
Each location answers a different environmental question.
A high result at one location does not establish that the entire property has the same concentration.
Likewise, one low result does not prove that every source area is unaffected.
Metals concentrations may also vary vertically.
Potential reasons include:
A surface result should not automatically be assumed to represent deeper soil.
Each laboratory result should be tied to the specific sampling interval.
Usually not.
One result represents the submitted sample.
Whether it can support a broader conclusion depends on:
This is why laboratory accuracy and representative sampling must work together.
Background samples can sometimes provide useful context where naturally occurring concentrations need to be considered.
Whether background sampling is appropriate depends on the project.
A useful background sample should represent conditions relevant to the comparison question.
Simply collecting a sample from somewhere else on the property does not automatically make it a meaningful background sample.
The environmental professional should determine the appropriate background-sampling strategy.
Potentially.
Fill material may have:
If a property contains distinct fill zones, combining them into a single sample may obscure important differences.
The origin and distribution of fill should therefore be considered during sampling and interpretation.
It depends on the project objective.
Composite samples combine several increments into one laboratory sample.
This can provide an average concentration, but it can also reduce information about individual locations.
For example:
Combining all three may produce an average that makes the localized elevated area less obvious.
If the objective is to identify a localized source or delineate an impact, individual samples may provide more useful spatial information.
Related Resource: How to Collect Soil Samples for Environmental Testing →
Additional sampling may be required when a metals concentration is elevated.
Samples from surrounding locations can help evaluate how far the elevated concentrations extend laterally.
Samples at different depths can help evaluate whether elevated concentrations extend deeper into the soil profile.
The laboratory measures the concentrations.
The environmental investigation determines the sampling pattern and site-level interpretation.
Potentially.
Elevated soil metals do not automatically mean groundwater is affected.
Whether groundwater investigation is relevant depends on factors such as:
Where groundwater is part of the investigation, PBR provides applicable environmental water testing.
Soil chemistry can provide additional context for some metals investigations.
Relevant characteristics may include:
For example, soil chemical conditions can influence how some metals behave in the environment.
This does not mean a pH result alone predicts metal movement.
Instead, soil chemistry can be one part of the broader site characterization.
Where metals are identified as contaminants of concern, laboratory testing may be used at several stages:
Initial characterization
↓
Delineation
↓
Remediation or soil management
↓
Follow-up sampling
↓
Analytical comparison
The analytical panel should remain focused on the metals relevant to the site and project.
Related Application: Soil Testing for Remediation & Reclamation →
It means the submitted follow-up sample had a lower measured concentration than the comparison sample.
That may provide useful evidence.
However, it does not automatically establish that:
Before comparing results, also check whether:
Variation can occur because of:
Large differences between samples should therefore trigger review of the site context rather than immediate assumptions.
Additional targeted sampling may help determine whether the variation represents a localized source, background variability or another site condition.
When reviewing a soil metals report, ask:
This is the decision-focused interpretation PBR should own in search.
Industrial projects may need metals testing where historical or current activities involved metal-containing materials.
The analytical panel should be based on the actual industrial process rather than ordering the same broad suite for every facility.
Related Application: Soil Testing for Oil, Gas & Industrial Sites →
Historical industrial properties, imported fill and previously developed land can create metals-related environmental questions.
Testing may support site characterization before or during redevelopment.
Related Application: Environmental Soil Testing for Land Development & Construction →
Environmental consultants may use metals data as part of:
PBR provides the analytical result and laboratory support, while the broader site interpretation remains part of the environmental investigation.
Related Application: Soil Testing for Environmental Consultants & Site Assessment →
PBR Laboratories provides soil metals testing support from Edmonton for environmental projects throughout Alberta, Western Canada and Canada.
PBR's decision-focused approach is:
Do not stop at “What number did the laboratory report?”
Ask:
“What does this concentration mean for this sample, this site and the decision we need to make?”
That is how laboratory data becomes useful environmental information.
It reports the concentration of the analyzed element measured in the submitted soil sample. Interpretation depends on the metal, location, depth, background conditions, site history and applicable criteria.
No. Many elements occur naturally in soil. Detection alone does not establish contamination.
It means the measured concentration is above the comparison value being used for the project. Further review may be required to understand source and extent.
Local geology and soil-forming materials can contribute naturally occurring metals. Background conditions may therefore be important when interpreting some results.
No. One result represents one submitted sample. Additional sampling may be needed to evaluate distribution.
No. Site-level conclusions depend on the sampling design and whether relevant source areas were adequately represented.
It depends on the project. Compositing provides an average but may obscure localized elevated concentrations.
Yes, potentially. Fill may differ from native soil in geological origin, composition or historical use.
Potentially, depending on the metal, soil chemistry, geology, groundwater conditions and project objectives.
Confirm the analyte, units and criteria; review location, depth, background and site history; compare surrounding samples; and determine whether further delineation or related environmental testing is needed.
When contacting PBR, provide where possible:
PBR can discuss applicable analytical testing and laboratory sample requirements for the next step.